Key result
The addition of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to standard care upgraded occupational status in 62% of investigated military aircrew, with 37% returning to unrestricted flying duties.
Why the study?
The benefit of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in assessing occupational risk was unknown, and ECG and examination anomalies frequently result in lengthy restrictions pending full investigation.
Does the addition of CMR to standard care improve occupational risk stratification and return to flying status in military aircrew with suspected cardiac anomalies?
Observational (n=52)
Yes
Does the addition of CMR to standard care improve occupational risk stratification and return to flying status in military aircrew with suspected cardiac anomalies?
Absolute Event Rate: 36.5% vs 0%
p-value: p=<0.001
The addition of CMR to standard cardiovascular assessment in military aircrew significantly improves diagnostic certainty and facilitates return to unrestricted flying duties.
BACKGROUND: The benefit of cardiovascular magnetic resonance Imaging (CMR) in assessing occupational risk is unknown. Pilots undergo frequent medical assessment for occult disease, which threatens incapacitation or distraction during flight. ECG and examination anomalies often lead to lengthy restriction, pending full investigation. CMR provides a sensitive, specific assessment of cardiac anatomy, tissue characterisation, perfusion defects and myocardial viability. We sought to determine if CMR, when added to standard care, would alter occupational outcome. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of all personnel attending the RAF Aviation Medicine Consultation Service (AMCS) for assessment of a cardiac anomaly, over a 2-year period. Those undergoing standard of care (history, examination, exercise ECG, 24 h-Holter and transthoracic echocardiography), and those undergoing a CMR in addition, were identified. The influence of CMR upon the final decision regarding flying restriction was determined by comparing the diagnosis reached with standard of care plus CMR vs. standard of care alone. RESULTS: Of the ~ 8000 UK military aircrew, 558 personnel were seen for cardiovascular assessment. Fifty-two underwent CMR. A normal TTE did not reliably exclude abnormalities subsequently detected by CMR. Addition of CMR resulted in an upgraded occupational status in 62% of those investigated, with 37% returning to unrestricted duties. Only 8% of referrals were undiagnosed following CMR. All these were cases of borderline chamber dilatation and reduction in systolic function in whom diagnostic uncertainty remained between physiological exercise adaptation and early cardiomyopathy. CONCLUSIONS: CMR increases the likelihood of a definitive diagnosis and of return to flying. This study supports early use of CMR in occupational assessment for high-hazard occupations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holdsworth et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Suspected cardiovascular disease (n=52). Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CMR) vs. Standard of care alone was evaluated on Change in occupational disposal (return to unrestricted flying status) (p=<0.001). The addition of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to standard care upgraded occupational status in 62% of investigated military aircrew, with 37% returning to unrestricted flying duties.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: