Cohort (n=167)
Blinded assessors
No
Hazard Ratio: 2.04 (95% CI 1.1–3.79)
p-value: p=0.024
In patients with pulmonary hypertension, prolonged P-wave duration (>0.11 s) and atrial fibrillation serve as prognostic markers associated with shorter survival.
ECG parameters may aid PH risk stratification; leaves open prospective validation before guiding practice.
BACKGROUND: Several studies have analyzed arrhythmias in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) and increased P-wave duration was identified as a risk factor for development of atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the incidence of arrhythmias in patients with an initial diagnosis of PH during long-term follow-up and assessed the prognostic value of electrocardiography (ECG) data. Data from 167 patients were analyzed (Dana Point Classification: Group 1: 59 patients, Group 2: 28 patients, Group 3: 39 patients, Group 4: 41 patients). Clinical, 6-min-ute walk distance test, echocardiography and right heart catheterization data were collected, and baseline/follow-up ECGs were analyzed. RESULTS: Baseline ECGs revealed sinus rhythm in 137 patients. Thirteen patients had newly onset AF during follow-up. In 30 patients, baseline ECG showed AF. Patients with baseline AF showed higher atrial diameters and higher right atrial pressure. Patients with P-wave du-ration > 0.11 s had shorter survival. Other ECG parameters (PQ-interval, QRS-width, QT-/ /QTc-interval) were not associated with survival. Mean survival times were 79.4 ± 5.4 months (sinus rhythm), 64.4 ± 12.9 months (baseline AF) and 58.8 ± 8.9 months (newly onset AF during follow-up) (p = 0.565). CONCLUSIONS: Atrial fibrillation predict adverse prognosis in patients with PH and a longer P-wave (> 0.11 s) is associated with shorter survival time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bandorski et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Pulmonary hypertension (n=167). P-wave duration > 0.11 s vs. P-wave duration < 0.1 s was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.10-3.79, p=0.024).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: