Key result
High psychological distress was associated with increased risk of cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, or heart failure hospitalization compared with low distress (HR 2.27; 95% CI 1.69-3.06).
Why the study?
Psychological distress is a recognized risk factor in patients with coronary heart disease, but its clinical significance and contribution to risk prediction remain unclear.
Does high psychological distress increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with stable coronary heart disease?
Cohort (n=891)
Does high psychological distress increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with stable coronary heart disease?
Hazard Ratio: 2.27 (95% CI 1.69–3.06)
A composite measure of psychological distress is independently associated with a more than two-fold increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with stable CHD and significantly improves traditional risk prediction models.
Psychological distress score associated with higher events and improved prediction in stable CHD; leaves open whether screening or intervention alters outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Psychological distress is a recognized risk factor in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), but its clinical significance is unclear. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine if an index of psychological distress is independently associated with adverse outcomes and significantly contributes to risk prediction. METHODS: Pooled analysis of 2 prospective cohort studies of patients with stable CHD (N = 891). A psychological distress score was constructed using measures of depression, anxiety, anger, perceived stress, and post-traumatic stress disorder, measured at baseline. The study endpoint included cardiovascular death or first or recurrent nonfatal myocardial infarction or hospitalization for heart failure at 5.9 years. RESULTS: In both cohorts, first and recurrent events occurred more often among those in the highest tertile of distress score than those in the lowest tertile. After combining the 2 cohorts, compared with the lowest tertile, the hazards ratio for having a distress score in the highest tertile was 2.27 (95% CI: 1.69-3.06), and for the middle tertile, it was 1.52 (95% CI: 1.10-2.08). Adjustment for demographics and clinical risk factors only slightly weakened the associations. When the distress score was added to a traditional clinical risk model, C-statistic, net reclassification index, and integrative discrimination index all significantly improved. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with CHD, a composite measure of psychological distress was significantly associated with an increased risk of adverse events and significantly improved risk prediction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
García et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Stable coronary heart disease (n=891). High psychological distress (highest tertile) vs. Low psychological distress (lowest tertile) was evaluated on Cardiovascular death or first or recurrent nonfatal myocardial infarction or hospitalization for heart failure (HR 2.27, 95% CI 1.69-3.06). High psychological distress was associated with increased risk of cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, or heart failure hospitalization compared with low distress (HR 2.27; 95% CI 1.69-3.06).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: