Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates the impossibility of certain representations in prime powers, indicating further mathematical implications.
Motivated by the Erdős–Straus conjecture, we study whether the Euler totient ratio <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mfrac> <m:mrow> <m:mi>φ</m:mi> <m:mo>(</m:mo> <m:mi>n</m:mi> <m:mo>)</m:mo> </m:mrow> <m:mi>n</m:mi> </m:mfrac> </m:math> φ(n)/n can be expressed as a sum of three unit fractions, <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="block"> <m:mrow> <m:mfrac> <m:mrow> <m:mi>φ</m:mi> <m:mo>(</m:mo> <m:mi>n</m:mi> <m:mo>)</m:mo> </m:mrow> <m:mi>n</m:mi> </m:mfrac> <m:mo>=</m:mo> <m:mfrac> <m:mn>1</m:mn> <m:mi>x</m:mi> </m:mfrac> <m:mo>+</m:mo> <m:mfrac> <m:mn>1</m:mn> <m:mi>y</m:mi> </m:mfrac> <m:mo>+</m:mo> <m:mfrac> <m:mn>1</m:mn> <m:mi>z</m:mi> </m:mfrac> <m:mo>,</m:mo> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>x</m:mi> <m:mo>,</m:mo> <m:mi>y</m:mi> <m:mo>,</m:mo> <m:mi>z</m:mi> <m:mo>∈</m:mo> <m:mi>ℕ</m:mi> <m:mo>.</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:math> φ(n)/n = 1/x + 1/y + 1/z, x, y, z ∈ N. We prove that such a representation is impossible for prime powers p k with p ≥ 11, and for integers of the form p k 1 q k 2 with p ≥ 5 and q ≥ 15 p . In contrast, for 2 ≤ p ≤ 7 the representation exists for all p k . Moreover, for every integer r ≥ 3, there are infinitely many integers n with ω ( n )= r for which no such representation exists. Further, if a representation holds, we obtain the bounds <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="block"> <m:mrow> <m:mn>2</m:mn> <m:mo>≤</m:mo> <m:mi>x</m:mi> <m:mo>≤</m:mo> <m:mn>9</m:mn> <m:mo>+</m:mo> <m:mn>3</m:mn> <m:msup> <m:mi>e</m:mi> <m:mi>γ</m:mi> </m:msup> <m:mtext>log log</m:mtext> <m:mi>n</m:mi> <m:mo>,</m:mo> <m:mspace width="1em"/> <m:mfrac> <m:mrow> <m:mi>n</m:mi> <m:mi>x</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>φ</m:mi> <m:mo>(</m:mo> <m:mi>n</m:mi> <m:mo>)</m:mo> <m:mi>x</m:mi> <m:mo>−</m:mo> <m:mi>n</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:mfrac> <m:mo>≤</m:mo> <m:mi>y</m:mi> <m:mo>≤</m:mo> <m:mfrac> <m:mrow> <m:mn>2</m:mn> <m:mi>n</m:mi> <m:mi>x</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>φ</m:mi> <m:mo>(</m:mo> <m:mi>n</m:mi> <m:mo>)</m:mo> <m:mi>x</m:mi> <m:mo>−</m:mo> <m:mi>n</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:mfrac> <m:mo>.</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:math> 2 ≤ x ≤ 9 + 3eγ log log n, nx/φ(n)x - n ≤ y ≤ 2nx/φ(n)x - n. In addition, if <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi>x</m:mi> <m:mo>≥</m:mo> <m:mfrac> <m:mrow> <m:mn>3</m:mn> <m:mo>(</m:mo> <m:mi>n</m:mi> <m:mo>-</m:mo> <m:mn>1</m:mn> <m:mo>)</m:mo> <m:mo>(</m:mo> <m:msup> <m:mi>e</m:mi> <m:mi>γ</m:mi> </m:msup> <m:mtext>log log</m:mtext> <m:mi>n</m:mi> <m:mo>+</m:mo> <m:mn>3</m:mn> <m:mo>)</m:mo> </m:mrow> <m:mi>n</m:mi> </m:mfrac> </m:mrow> </m:math> x ≥ {3(n-1)(eγ log log n + 3)}{n} , then rad <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sagar Mandal (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: