Retrospective cohort study assesses the impact of endometrial thickness on miscarriage risk and complications.
This study aimed to explore whether an endometrial thickness (EMT) cutoff of 7 mm or 8 mm was more appropriate to define thin endometrium (TE) from the perspective of miscarriage and obstetric-neonatal complications. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 15,979 patients who had a positive serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin test after undergoing their first frozen-thaw embryo transfer. The main outcomes were early pregnancy loss, late pregnancy loss, and the rates of obstetric and neonatal complications. When TE was defined by EMT <8 mm, the TE group exhibited a similar risk of early miscarriage (17.2% versus 15.7%, P=0.086) to the control group (EMT ≥8 mm). However, the TE group defined by EMT <7 mm had significantly higher rates of early miscarriage (21.5% versus 15.6%, P<0.001) than the control group (EMT ≥7 mm). The conclusion remained consistent after adjustment for age and other confounders in logistic regression. In addition, the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for preterm birth increased from 1.281 (95% CI: 1.022-1.606) at an EMT <8 mm to 2.050 (95% CI: 1.427-2.945) at an EMT <7 mm, and the aOR for low birth weight increased from 1.394 (95% CI: 1.041-1.867) at an EMT <8 mm to 2.488 (95% CI: 1.611-3.843) at an EMT <7 mm. When thin endometrium was defined as EMT <7 mm, the TE group had significantly higher risks of early miscarriage, preterm birth, and low birth weight than when thin endometrium was defined as EMT <8 mm. Because dilation and curettage after miscarriage may further damage the endometrium in patients with thin endometrium, pregnancy loss should be considered when debating the definition of thin endometrium.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth