Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study investigates links between HPV integration and severe cervical lesions in women, highlighting clinical implications.
This study aimed to investigate the association between human papillomavirus (HPV) 16/18, HPV integration status, and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse (CIN3 +), and to provide evidence and theoretical support for the clinical translation of HPV integration testing. This was a multicenter cross-sectional study conducted within a cervical cancer screening program in China. HPV integration was detected using high-throughput viral integration detection (HIVID). Structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed to examine the mediating effect of HPV integration. A total of 3,077 high-risk HPV-positive women were included in the final analysis. Among these participants, 29.5% were infected with HPV 16/18, 12.9% tested positive for HPV integration, and 5.9% had biopsy-confirmed CIN3 + . Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that both HPV integration and HPV 16/18 were independently associated with CIN3 + . In mediation analysis, the standardized path coefficient for the direct effect of HPV 16/18 on CIN3 + was 0.087. For the indirect effect, the standardized path coefficient from HPV 16/18 to HPV integration was 0.404, and from HPV integration to CIN3 + was 0.771. The mediating effect of HPV integration accounted for 78.1% of the total effect. This study elucidates the mediating role of HPV integration in the progression from HPV 16/18 infection to CIN3 + , offering new insights into HPV risk stratification and clinical management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: