Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates effective certifying grounding in finite domains, suggesting enhanced trust in solving processes.
Grounding, the translation of high-level theories into equivalent quantifier-free formulas, is a crucial step in declarative solving, yet it has so far escaped the proof-logging revolution.When this grounding step is not certifying, there is no way of knowing that the obtained solutions actually correspond to the original problem specification, resulting in a trust gap.In this paper, we close the trust gap between the user's high-level specification and the solver's low-level input by introducing a novel certifying grounding framework for first-order logic model expansion (FOX) over finite domains.We present CertiFOX, a framework consisting of: (1) a proof format for grounding derivations, (2) GroundFOX, a certifying grounder operating on theories in Grounding Normal Form (GNF)-a new normal form designed for compact, domain-aware grounding-and (3) CheckFOX, an independent proof checker.Our approach guarantees that the grounder's output is equivalent to the input specification, setting the stage for trustworthy end-to-end certified solving pipelines for declarative languages.Experimental evaluation confirms that CERTIFOX is a feasible approach.The GROUND-FOX grounder is broadly comparable with other grounders, and proof checking with CHECKFOX adds overhead within a small constant factor of grounding time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caudenberg et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: