Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Shows improved compressive strength prediction in fiber-reinforced concrete, indicating effective framework development.
Reliable prediction of fiber-reinforced concrete (FRC) compressive strength is central to data-driven mixture design, where mixture components interact nonlinearly. This study develops a protocol-aware machine-learning framework using 521 steel-fiber records for internal modeling and 271 basalt-fiber records for external evaluation. Twenty regressors are benchmarked on 12 raw inputs augmented with six engineered descriptors; Boruta selection retains 14 predictors. Across 30 repeated holdout experiments, ExtraTrees and CatBoost emerge as statistically indistinguishable top performers (R² = 0.94 – 0.96, RMSE = 3.9 – 4.2 MPa); CatBoost is selected for its balance of accuracy and interpretability. SHAP, ALE, permutation importance, and LIME identify water content, water–cement ratio, and coarse aggregate as principal drivers. Zero-shot external evaluation shows a sharp performance drop (R² = 0.52), while 30% target-domain calibration restores strong accuracy (R² = 0.83). Bayesian intervals achieve 92% coverage. The framework enables reliable, interpretable, uncertainty-aware FRC strength screening.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: