Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Structural audit of physics theories reveals persistence and identity across disciplines, suggesting new implications.
La Profilée is a universal structural law of persistence under transformation. This record collects the four documents that frame the physics series rather than contribute to it: what the law claims, how the nine papers are to be read, what the law rules out, and where every claim currently stands.Every physical theory applies a criterion of sameness through change — the electron after the scattering, the region after the collapse, the system after the cut between system and environment was drawn — and no physical theory states one. The physics series inserts that missing criterion at points where it is already being used silently, and asks what follows. LP-PHY-00 states what the law contributes and what the domain must supply, gives the dependency structure of the nine papers, explains the status labels, and reports the line-by-line proof audit including the errors it found. LP-UNIV-01 carries the claim the physics is evidence for: that the same architecture, with the same role structure, recurs across physics, biology, chemistry and cognition, and that this recurrence — not the derivation — is what could fail.What La Profilée Excludes in Physics collects the negative results. The law determines no dimensionless physical constant, and this is a theorem about the architecture rather than a gap in it. But a law that fixes no value can still declare values, processes and scenarios impossible, and a possibility-verdict over physical states is a physical statement. Collected here: probability claims the law renders ill-posed, a bound within which the cosmological constant must sit, a coupling constant shown not to be free, a class of dynamics forbidden, and physical processes removed from the admissible set. Several are testable; one is a prediction already confirmed against published data.The Master Catalogue is the programme map and audit register — module structure, gap register, dependency overview, and the status and derivation level of each entry. Where a module presents a finite named candidate set it applies the exclusion filter: candidates are enumerated, the architecture is applied, and candidates are excluded or reclassified. Each entry carries a falsifier of one recurring form — exhibit a domain-complete variable that decides both existence and identity across a real transformation, and the entry falls.Nothing in this record is a physics result. It is the claim map: what is closed, what is conditional, what is proved not to hold, and what remains open with the missing step named.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marc Maibom (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: