The Physics Programme: A Structural Audit of Persistence and Identity Across Physics

La Profilée is the structural law of determinate nature. This catalogue audits how physical theories realize its constitution, persistence, identity under transformation and relational organization. The starting point remains the physics itself: its states, observables, dynamics, theorems and measured parameters. The audit then asks which object, identity, boundary, admissibility or continuation premise the theory uses, and whether that premise is already formalized, conflated with another question, or missing at the stated proof site. These are findings A, B and C. A C-finding becomes a derivation obligation rather than an automatic declaration that a whole physical theory is defective. The catalogue retains 194 audit records in eighteen programmes, PR-0 through PR-17, including the seven general-relativistic questions and the original closure ledger. Constitution now establishes the addressed whole where its profile is not yet fixed; Transformation evaluates Q1, Q2a and Q2b on that whole; Coexistence evaluates the RelConfig of distinct bearers. The physical subjects remain measurement, system cuts, spacetime, quantum gravity, thermodynamics, emergence, records and the other audited fields. The central new result is a common reduction obligation: a reduced description must retain the constitution and verdict distinctions required by its question and must carry representative-independent dynamics. Thermodynamic flux and multi-time process memory impose further question-specific requirements. The updated gauge audit derives the diagonal representation kernel and its four subgroup quotients from stated Standard-Model representations. It does not derive the numerical hypercharges from LP or choose the realized quotient. The declared joint realization range, its state fibers and its physical actuality are kept distinct. Throughout, a structural theorem, a domain theorem, their joint consequence, a constructed witness and an empirical realization claim receive different statuses. LP fixes structural form; physical realizations supply values. Native equations, worked counterexamples and synchronized ledger entries make that distinction explicit. 1. What this catalogue is Physics is full of continuity variables: norm, energy, charge, worldline, topological invariant, field support and order parameter. Its questions about stability and the same system already refer to a determinate physical object. LP makes that reference explicit and distinguishes what constitutes the object, whether it continues, whether its persistence class and profile continue, and whether its effective relations continue. This catalogue applies that architecture to the existing physics, rather than replacing the domain with a new dynamics. At each site we retain the original audit sequence: what physics supplies unchanged; where a structural premise is used; the LP insertion at that premise; the distinction and theorem or derivation target; the physical consequence; the test; and the status. Constitution enters at the object or profile obligation identified by this audit. It is not a generic new subject inserted before every physical problem. When the bearer is already established, its certificate is used and the physical continuation, relation or measurement question proceeds. The comparison must name the physical scope. An electron, quantum code, apparatus, stellar fluid, black-hole exterior, entire spacetime and emergent mode are different addressed wholes. Equal state descriptions, equal present readouts and equal complete physical profiles need not establish the same identity verdict. A change of addressed whole requires a new constitution check, while preserving the certificates of any already constituted members. The entries are classified by what the audit finds: A: the audited structure is already formalized in the domain under another name. B: the relevant questions are present but conflated or their relation is untyped. C: a precisely named proof uses a precondition for which the audited account supplies no derivation. These classes apply to inference sites. One module can contain several sites, and a B or C finding does not by itself refute the domain theory or establish originality. The status field separately reports whether the identified obligation has been discharged. The value of the audit is the repeated formal requirement across distinct physical realizations. Identity of a logical code, continuation of a spacetime and closure of a macrostate are different domain results, but each needs a typed carrier and a retained continuation structure. Where the domain already supplies these, the finding is A; where it conflates them with another variable, B; where a proof uses them without establishing them, C. The structural architecture does not supply a new force or numerical constant. Joint LP–physics results can nevertheless include equations, quantitative error bounds and explicit domain values. The no-value discipline forbids attributing such values to the universal role architecture alone; it does not forbid deriving them from the actual physical model. Universality of the structural law and completion of the audit in a further physical field are different claims.