Retrospective study identifies risk factors for ARDS in sepsis due to peptic ulcer perforation, suggesting clinical applications.
Background/Objectives: Our study aimed to identify risk factors for the development of ARDS (acute respiratory distress syndrome) in patients with sepsis resulting from peptic ulcer perforation. Methods: Between January 2018 and December 2025, patients aged 18 years and older who underwent open surgery for peptic ulcer perforation and were diagnosed with sepsis due to intra-abdominal infection related to peptic ulcer perforation during postoperative follow-up or hospitalization were included in the study. Daily ARDS screening was performed within 7 days of sepsis diagnosis. Patients were divided into groups with and without ARDS. Laboratory values were recorded within the first 24 h after sepsis diagnosis, and APACHE II score, SOFA score, NEWS, and SAPS II were calculated based on these values and the patient’s clinical condition. Results: The SOFA score showed the highest discriminative ability, with an AUC of 0.710 (95% CI: 0.619–0.794) at a cutoff of 9.0, representing 54.2% sensitivity and 83.1% specificity. Albumin level showed an AUC of 0.654 (95% CI: 0.560–0.748) at a cutoff of 2.40 g/dL; its specificity was high (85.1%), but its sensitivity was relatively low (41.7%). CAR showed moderate predictive performance with an AUC of 0.627 (95% CI: 0.522–0.730) at a cutoff of 61.11, representing 60.4% sensitivity and 72.1% specificity. The combined model demonstrated the best predictive performance with an AUC of 0.727 (95% CI: 0.635–0.820), 70.8% sensitivity, and 72.7% specificity. Conclusions: SOFA score demonstrated the best overall clinical applicability for early ARDS risk stratification, while both SOFA score and APACHE II score showed independent associations with ARDS in separate multivariable models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kahraman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: