Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines how short-term and long-term priors influence action perception, indicating complex interactions in visual cognition.
Predictive processing theories suggest that perception is shaped by prior knowledge, with long-term priors formed through lifelong experiences and short-term priors emerging from immediate contextual cues. Although prior research has explored the influence of expectations on action perception, the interaction between short-term and long-term priors remains understudied. This study examines how these priors interact in visual action perception by embedding animated human and robot agents within a probabilistic-cueing paradigm. Participants observed agents performing biological or mechanical motion, with cues providing either form-based or motion-based short-term priors. Behavioral results showed that long-term priors guided perceptual decisions across conditions when the target stimuli were congruent with them. When expectations were violated, performance patterns reflected a greater weighting of motion-based short-term cues, while form-based cues contributed minimally. These findings highlight the hierarchical nature of predictive processing in action perception, and the precision assigned to different priors is adjusted according to context, favoring motion-based information instead of form-based when resolving perceptual ambiguity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Özen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: