Abstract This paper advances a theoretical contribution, a triadic framework of human-AI-society interaction, and introduces a methodological innovation to support it. We argue that AI development is not a unidirectional pipeline from design to use but a recursive system of feedback loops across three interdependent spheres: practitioner-AI (design decisions), user-AI (application practices), and society-AI (evaluation and governance). To develop this theory, we propose an LLM-enhanced computational grounded theory framework that positions LLMs as analytic instruments within a human-led workflow. The framework comprises five phases: data construction, LLM-assisted topic generation, human-LLM topic refinement, computational confirmation, and theory generation. We operationalize the framework through a case study of public discourse about ChatGPT on Twitter (now X), analyzing 584,160 English-language tweets from the first three months following the model’s release. Empirical analysis reveals 10 themes and 54 subtopics that converge into three stakeholder-oriented interaction patterns corresponding to the triadic framework. The theoretical contribution is threefold: (1) reconceptualizing human-AI interaction as irreducibly triadic rather than dyadic; (2) specifying the mechanisms of recursive feedback loops (design enables use, use generates evaluation, evaluation feeds back into design); and (3) identifying temporal asymmetries (user adaptation in hours, corporate response in days, governance in years) as a structural feature of AI sociotechnical systems. Methodologically, this study demonstrates how LLMs can support saturation assessment at scale while maintaining interpretive rigor.
He et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: