Evaluates hydrogenation heat conversion efficiency for renewable power buffering, suggesting better grid support.
Renewable electricity is intermittent, motivating flexible buffering technologies. This study evaluates a thermally integrated system that recovers the exothermic heat of toluene hydrogenation in liquid organic hydrogen carrier (LOHC) systems and converts it into electricity for potential peak-demand buffering. Hydrogenation was carried out at 150–250 ℃ over Ru/Al 2 O 3 and Pt/Al 2 O 3 catalysts; Pt/Al 2 O 3 gave higher methylcyclohexane (MCH) selectivity and better thermal stability. A process model was built in Aspen Plus for a hydrogen processing capacity of 1,000 kg/h, and raising the steam pressure from 5 to 50 bar increased the net power output from 1,612 to 2,271 kW. A techno-economic analysis (TEA) using a stacked cost–revenue framework was applied to two configurations. In the co-production case (Case A), MCH is the primary product and the recovered heat yields electricity as a co-product, so the economics are set mainly by the MCH value. In the closed-loop case (Case B), electricity is the only product, giving a baseline levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) of 0.51 $/kWh against an industrial benchmark of 0.09 $/kWh; lowering the dehydrogenation energy cost is the key lever toward grid parity. A life cycle assessment (LCA) gives 0.24–0.33 kg CO 2 -eq/kWh, below the grid average, provided that dehydrogenation energy use and material losses are controlled. LOHC facilities could therefore act not only as hydrogen-storage units but also as distributed power nodes that support grid flexibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: