Key result
Pulmonary arterial hypertension is strongly associated with aberrant bone morphogenetic protein signalling, dysregulated growth factors, and progressive endothelial cell dysfunction.
This review discusses the pathophysiological mechanisms of pulmonary vascular remodeling in pulmonary arterial hypertension, highlighting potential therapeutic targets such as BMPR2 and TGF-β signaling.
PAH inflammation data remain observational; leaves open causal role in remodeling and need for targeted trials.
Extract Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare, progressive disorder of the pre-capillary pulmonary circulation, characterised by progressive pulmonary vascular remodelling and vasoconstriction, increased pulmonary vascular resistance, right ventricular hypertrophy, right heart failure and premature death, despite the development of several effective therapies [1–3]. Several factors have been implicated in the pulmonary vascular remodelling, including inflammatory, immunological, epigenetic and genetic factors, such as bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 2 (BMPR2) genetic variants, the most prevalent genetic variant identified in hereditable PAH [4]. Strong associations have been identified between the development of PAH, and 1) aberrant bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signalling via BMPR2 receptors, 2) dysregulated growth factors, manifesting an imbalance in proliferative and anti-proliferative transforming growth factor (TGF)-β signalling and upregulation of the activin pathway regulated by ActRIIA, 3) progressive endothelial cell dysfunction, 4) pathological distal fibro-proliferation, and 5) plexogenic pulmonary vascular remodelling [4, 5].
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lordan et al. (2025) conducted a review in Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Pulmonary arterial hypertension is strongly associated with aberrant bone morphogenetic protein signalling, dysregulated growth factors, and progressive endothelial cell dysfunction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: