Definite diagnosis of coronary microvascular dysfunction relies on invasive evaluation, which is currently recommended only for patients with intractable symptoms who fail empirical therapy.
Definite clinical diagnosis of microvascular angina is not possible with the existing knowledge. Resting electrocardiogram may be normal, and exercise electrocardiogram may be unremarkable. Echocardiography usually does not show regional wall motion abnormalities. Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography can satisfactorily evaluate only left anterior descending coronary artery and that too in some patients. Radio-isotope imaging can detect only severe localized disease. Noninvasive diagnosis needs high index of suspicion. At present, definite diagnosis is based on documentation of normal epicardial coronaries, coronary flow reserve less than 2.5 on adenosine induced hyperemia, and absence of spasm of epicardial coronaries on acetylcholine provocation. Invasive evaluation is costly, needs sophisticated equipments and expertise. Therapeutic and prognostic implications of various parameters remains to be evaluated. At present invasive evaluation is recommended only for patients with intractable symptoms with unconfirmed diagnosis, requiring repeated hospitalization and evaluation with failure of empirical therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
S.R. Mittal (2015) conducted a review in Coronary microvascular dysfunction. Invasive diagnostic evaluation was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: