Why the study?
New therapies are needed for refractory angina, and the maximal tolerated dose and safety of direct epicardial encoberminogene rezmadenovec administration remain unknown.
Is epicardial delivery of encoberminogene rezmadenovec safe and tolerable in patients with refractory angina?
Is epicardial delivery of encoberminogene rezmadenovec safe and tolerable in patients with refractory angina?
Epicardial delivery of the novel gene therapy encoberminogene rezmadenovec is feasible and well-tolerated in patients with refractory angina, supporting progression to phase 2 trials.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports phase 2 advancement; leaves open efficacy in refractory angina.
BACKGROUND: New therapies are needed for patients with refractory angina. Encoberminogene rezmadenovec (XC001), a novel adenoviral-5 vector coding for all 3 major isoforms of VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor), demonstrated enhanced local angiogenesis in preclinical models; however, the maximal tolerated dose and safety of direct epicardial administration remain unknown. METHODS: In the phase 1 portion of this multicenter, open-label, single-arm, dose-escalation study, patients with refractory angina received increasing doses of encoberminogene rezmadenovec (1×10 9 , 1×10 10 , 4×10 10 , and 1×10 11 viral particles) to evaluate its safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy. Patients had class II to IV angina on maximally tolerated medical therapy, demonstrable ischemia on stress testing, and were angina-limited on exercise treadmill testing. Patients underwent minithoracotomy with epicardial delivery of 15 0.1-mL injections of encoberminogene rezmadenovec. The primary outcome was safety via adverse event monitoring over 6 months. Efficacy assessments included difference from baseline to months 3, 6 (primary), and 12 in total exercise duration, myocardial perfusion deficit using positron emission tomography, angina class, angina frequency, and quality of life. RESULTS: From June 2, 2020 to June 25, 2021, 12 patients were enrolled into 4 dosing cohorts with 1×10 11 viral particle as the highest planned dose. Seventeen serious adverse events were reported in 7 patients; none were related to study drug. Six serious adverse events in 4 patients were related to the thoracotomy, 3 non–serious adverse events were possibly related to study drug. The 2 lowest doses did not demonstrate improvements in total exercise duration, myocardial perfusion deficit, or angina frequency; however, there appeared to be improvements in all parameters with the 2 higher doses. CONCLUSIONS: Epicardial delivery of encoberminogene rezmadenovec via minithoracotomy is feasible, and up to 1×10 11 viral particle appears well tolerated. A dose response was observed across 4 dosing cohorts in total exercise duration, myocardial perfusion deficit, and angina class. The highest dose (1×10 11 viral particle) was carried forward into phase 2. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT04125732.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Povsic et al. (2023) studied Refractory angina (n=12). Encoberminogene rezmadenovec (XC001) was evaluated on Safety via adverse event monitoring over 6 months.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: