This article argues that, although at times it is necessary to define HRD for political reasons, there is a strong case that HRD should not be defined on philosophical, theoretical and practical grounds. To proffer definitions of HRD is to misrepresent it as a thing of being rather than a process of becoming . Defining the field also runs the risk of disengaging from the moral dimension of HRD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Monica Lee (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: