Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Conceptual analysis reveals how aligning flexible work models with common good human resource principles improves worker well-being, highlighting pathways to sustainable societal outcomes.
This paper examines how the COVID-19 pandemic accelerated changes in Human Resource Management (HRM) to support remote, hybrid, and flexible work arrangements, and considers the implications of these changes for Common Good Human Resource Management (CG-HRM). Drawing on Organisational Adaptation Theory, Stakeholder Theory, and CG-HRM principles, it proposes a conceptual framework mapping organisational responses across work models, from fully remote and hybrid configurations to mandated returns to the office. The analysis highlights consequences for employee well-being, work–life integration, organisational culture, and environmental sustainability. It argues that organisations aligning HRM adaptations with Common Good principles are better equipped to manage post-pandemic complexity while generating wider societal benefits. Four HRM domains are identified: virtual recruitment and onboarding; performance management for distributed teams; employee well-being and work–life balance initiatives; and digital training and development. By integrating these perspectives, the paper addresses a gap in research on sustainable HRM amid crisis and rapid change. It offers practical insights for aligning organisational adaptation with social well-being and environmental responsibility, while outlining a future research agenda on the long-term effects of HRM and Human Resource Development innovations on organisational outcomes, mobility, and the common good.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barbosa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: