Key result
Non-invasive sensor-derived pulse transit time correlates moderately with invasive systolic blood pressure.
Why the study?
Non-invasive beat-to-beat pulse transit time acquired via piezoelectric/piezocapacitive sensors may expand perioperative hemodynamic monitoring.
Does non-invasive beat-to-beat pulse transit time monitoring via PES/PCS correlate with invasively acquired blood pressure in high-risk surgical patients?
Observational (n=20)
No
Does non-invasive beat-to-beat pulse transit time monitoring via PES/PCS correlate with invasively acquired blood pressure in high-risk surgical patients?
Non-invasive PES/PCS sensors can reliably track beat-to-beat pulse transit time, correlating significantly with invasive blood pressure and predicting hypotensive/hypertensive events intraoperatively.
PTT via PES was associated with invasive BP in small surgical cohorts; hypothesis-generating and leaves open clinical utility pending larger trials.
Background: Non-invasive acquistion of beat-to-beat pulse transit time (PTT) via piezoelectric/piezocapacitive sensors (PES/PCS) may expand perioperative hemodynamic monitoring. This study evaluated the ability for PTT via PES/PCS to correlate with systolic, diastolic, and mean invasive blood pressure (SBPIBP, DBPIBP, and MAPIBP) and to detect SBPIBP fluctuations. Methods: PES/PCS and IBP measurements were performed in 20 patients undergoing abdominal, urological, and cardiac surgery. A Pearson’s correlation analysis (r) between 1/PTT and IBP was performed. The predictive ability of 1/PTT with changes in SBPIBP was determined by area under the curve (reported as AUC, sensitivity, specificity). Results: Significant correlations between 1/PTT and SBPIBP were found for PES (r=0.64) and PCS (r=0.55) (p<0.01), as well as MAPIBP/DBPIBP for PES (r=0.6/0.55) and PCS (r=0.5/0.45) (p<0.05). A 7% decrease in 1/PTTPES predicted a 30% SBPIBP decrease(0.82, 0.76, 0.76), while a 5.6% increase predicted a 30% SBPIBP increase (0.75, 0.7, 0.68). A 6.6% decrease in 1/PTTPCS detected a 30% SBPIBP decrease (0.81, 0.72, 0.8), while a 4.8% 1/PTTPCS increase detected a 30% SBPIBP increase (0.73, 0.64, 0.68). Conclusions: Non-invasive beat-to-beat PTT via PES/PCS demonstrated significant correlations with IBP and detected significant changes in SBPIBP. Thus PES/PCS as a novel sensor technology may augment intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring during major surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nordine et al. (2023) conducted an observational in High-risk surgical patients (n=20). Non-invasive piezoelectric/piezocapacitive sensors (PES/PCS) vs. Invasively acquired blood pressure (IBP) via left radial artery catheter was evaluated on Correlation between 1/PTT (pulse transit time) and systolic invasive blood pressure (SBPIBP) (r=0.64 for PES and r=0.55 for PCS, p=<0.01). Non-invasive beat-to-beat PTT via PES demonstrated significant correlations with systolic invasive blood pressure (r=0.64, p<0.01) and a 7% decrease in 1/PTTPES predicted a 30% decrease in SBPIBP.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: