Key result
Piezoelectric pulse transit time correlates moderately with invasive systolic blood pressure and predicts large fluctuations.
Why the study?
Non-invasive tracking of beat-to-beat pulse transit time via piezoelectric/piezocapacitive sensors may expand perioperative hemodynamic monitoring, prompting evaluation of its correlation with invasive blood pressure.
Does non-invasive PTT via PES/PCS correlate with and predict changes in invasive blood pressure in high-risk surgical patients?
Observational (n=20)
No
Does non-invasive PTT via PES/PCS correlate with and predict changes in invasive blood pressure in high-risk surgical patients?
Effect estimate: r = 0.64
p-value: p=<0.01
Novel non-invasive piezoelectric/piezocapacitive sensors can reliably track beat-to-beat pulse transit time and predict significant blood pressure fluctuations during major surgery, offering a potential alternative for intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring.
Non-invasive piezoelectric PTT was associated with invasive SBP in surgery; leaves open whether it can guide hemodynamic management pending validation.
Background: Non-invasive tracking of beat-to-beat pulse transit time (PTT) via piezoelectric/piezocapacitive sensors (PES/PCS) may expand perioperative hemodynamic monitoring. This study evaluated the ability for PTT via PES/PCS to correlate with systolic, diastolic, and mean invasive blood pressure (SBPIBP, DBPIBP, and MAPIBP, respectively) and to detect SBPIBP fluctuations. Methods: PES/PCS and IBP measurements were performed in 20 patients undergoing abdominal, urological, and cardiac surgery. A Pearson’s correlation analysis (r) between 1/PTT and IBP was performed. The predictive ability of 1/PTT with changes in SBPIBP was determined by area under the curve (reported as AUC, sensitivity, specificity). Results: Significant correlations between 1/PTT and SBPIBP were found for PES (r = 0.64) and PCS (r = 0.55) (p < 0.01), as well as MAPIBP/DBPIBP for PES (r = 0.6/0.55) and PCS (r = 0.5/0.45) (p < 0.05). A 7% decrease in 1/PTTPES predicted a 30% SBPIBP decrease (0.82, 0.76, 0.76), while a 5.6% increase predicted a 30% SBPIBP increase (0.75, 0.7, 0.68). A 6.6% decrease in 1/PTTPCS detected a 30% SBPIBP decrease (0.81, 0.72, 0.8), while a 4.8% 1/PTTPCS increase detected a 30% SBPIBP increase (0.73, 0.64, 0.68). Conclusions: Non-invasive beat-to-beat PTT via PES/PCS demonstrated significant correlations with IBP and detected significant changes in SBPIBP. Thus, PES/PCS as a novel sensor technology may augment intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring during major surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nordine et al. (2023) conducted an observational in High-risk surgical patients (n=20). Pulse transit time (PTT) monitoring via non-invasive piezoelectric/piezocapacitive peripheral sensors (PES/PCS) vs. Invasively acquired blood pressure (left radial artery catheter) was evaluated on Correlation between 1/PTT (PES) and invasive systolic blood pressure (SBPIBP) (r = 0.64, p=<0.01). Non-invasive pulse transit time monitoring via piezoelectric sensors significantly correlated with invasive systolic blood pressure (r = 0.64) and predicted large blood pressure fluctuations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: