Key result
The 3D multi-contrast vessel wall CMR technique provided isotropic 0.8 mm resolution and effective blood suppression (P < 0.0001) across intra- and extracranial segments within a 15-minute scan time.
Why the study?
Does 3D multi-contrast joint intra- and extracranial vessel wall CMR provide effective blood suppression and vessel wall delineation?
Cross-Sectional (n=27)
No
Does 3D multi-contrast joint intra- and extracranial vessel wall CMR provide effective blood suppression and vessel wall delineation?
p-value: p=<0.0001
The proposed 3D multi-contrast vessel wall CMR technique provides isotropic resolution and effective blood suppression for joint intra- and extracranial vessel wall imaging.
BACKGROUND: Multi-contrast vessel wall cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has demonstrated its capability for atherosclerotic plaque morphology measurement and component characterization in different vasculatures. However, limited coverage and partial volume effect with conventional two-dimensional (2D) techniques might cause lesion underestimation. The aim of this work is to evaluate the performance in a) blood suppression and b) vessel wall delineation of three-dimensional (3D) multi-contrast joint intra- and extracranial vessel wall imaging at 3T. METHODS: Three multi-contrast 3D black blood (BB) sequences with T1, T2 and heavy T1 weighting and a custom designed 36-channel neurovascular coil covering the entire intra- and extracranial vasculature have been used and investigated in this study. Two healthy subjects were recruited for sequence parameter optimization and twenty-five patients were consecutively scanned for image quality and blood suppression assessment. Qualitative image scores of vessel wall delineation as well as quantitative Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) and Contrast-to-Noise Ratio (CNR) were evaluated at five typical locations ranging from common carotid arteries to middle cerebral arteries. RESULTS: The 3D multi-contrast images acquired within 15mins allowed the vessel wall visualization with 0.8 mm isotropic spatial resolution covering intra- and extracranial segments. Quantitative wall and lumen SNR measurements for each sequence showed effective blood suppression at all selected locations (P < 0.0001). Although the wall-lumen CNR varied across measured locations, each sequence provided good or adequate image quality in both intra- and extracranial segments. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed 3D multi-contrast vessel wall technique provides isotropic resolution and time efficient solution for joint intra- and extracranial vessel wall CMR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2015) conducted a cross-sectional in Ischemic stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) (n=27). 3D multi-contrast joint intra- and extracranial vessel wall CMR was evaluated on Blood suppression effectiveness (wall vs lumen SNR) (p=<0.0001). The 3D multi-contrast vessel wall CMR technique provided isotropic 0.8 mm resolution and effective blood suppression (P < 0.0001) across intra- and extracranial segments within a 15-minute scan time.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: