Electromyographic monitoring using surface CMAP provided early warning of phrenic nerve injury during cryoballoon ablation, with CMAP amplitude decreasing more in PVs with reduced diaphragmatic motion (40.9% vs 11.3%; P<0.001).
Observational (n=200)
Does diaphragmatic electromyographic monitoring using surface electrodes prevent phrenic nerve injury during cryoballoon ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Electromyographic phrenic nerve monitoring using surface CMAP provides a reliable early warning for impending phrenic nerve injury during cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Absolute Event Rate: 40.9% vs 11.3%
p-value: p=<0.001
BACKGROUND: Phrenic nerve palsy remains the most frequent complication associated with cryoballoon-based pulmonary vein (PV) isolation. We sought to characterize our experience using a novel monitoring technique for the prevention of phrenic nerve palsy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred consecutive cryoballoon-based PV isolation procedures between October 2010 and October 2013 were studied. In addition to standard abdominal palpation during right phrenic nerve pacing from the superior vena cava, all patients underwent diaphragmatic electromyographic monitoring using surface electrodes. Cryoablation was terminated on any perceived reduction in diaphragmatic motion or a 30% decrease in the compound motor action potential (CMAP). During right-sided ablation, a ≥30% reduction in CMAP amplitude occurred in 49 patients (24.5%). Diaphragmatic motion decreased in 30 of 49 patients and was preceded by a 30% reduction in CMAP amplitude in all. In 82% of cases, this reduction in CMAP amplitude occurred during right superior PV isolation. The baseline CMAP amplitude was 946.5±609.2 mV and decreased by 13.8±13.8% at the end of application. This decrease was more marked in the 33 PVs with a reduction in diaphragmatic motion than in those without (40.9±15.3% versus 11.3±10.5%; P<0.001). In 3 cases, phrenic nerve palsy persisted beyond the end of the procedure, with all cases recovering within 6 months. Despite the shortened application all veins were isolated. At repeat procedure the right-sided PVs reconnected less frequently than the left-sided PVs in those with phrenic nerve palsy. CONCLUSIONS: Electromyographic phrenic nerve monitoring using the surface CMAP is reliable, easy to perform, and offers an early warning to impending phrenic nerve injury.
Mondésert et al. (Mon,) conducted a observational in Atrial Fibrillation (n=200). Diaphragmatic electromyographic monitoring using surface electrodes was evaluated on Decrease in CMAP amplitude in PVs with versus without a reduction in diaphragmatic motion (p=<0.001). Electromyographic monitoring using surface CMAP provided early warning of phrenic nerve injury during cryoballoon ablation, with CMAP amplitude decreasing more in PVs with reduced diaphragmatic motion (40.9% vs 11.3%; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: