Key result
Implantable cardiac electronic device therapy in systemic right ventricle patients faces challenges including uncertain CRT indications and limited sudden cardiac death risk stratification.
Why the study?
This review aimed to examine current evidence, knowledge gaps, and technical considerations regarding implantable cardiac electronic device therapy in patients with a systemic right ventricle.
This review highlights the current evidence, knowledge gaps, and technical challenges regarding implantable cardiac electronic device therapy in patients with a systemic right ventricle.
Highlights knowledge gaps and technical challenges in systemic right ventricle device therapy; leaves open prospective trials to define CRT and primary prevention ICD roles.
The systemic right ventricle (SRV), defined as the morphological right ventricle supporting the systemic circulation, is relatively common in congenital heart disease (CHD). Our review aimed at examining the current evidence, knowledge gaps and technical considerations regarding implantable cardiac electronic device therapy in patients with SRV. The risk of sinus node dysfunction (SND) after atrial switch repair and/or complete heart block in congenitally corrected transposition of great arteries requiring permanent pacing increases with age. Similar to acquired heart disease, indication for pacing includes symptomatic bradycardia, SND and high degree atrioventricular nodal block. Right ventricular dysfunction and heart failure also represent important complications in SRV patients. Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) has been proposed to improve systolic function in SRV patients, although indications for CRT are not well defined and its potential benefit remains uncertain. Amongst adult CHD, patients with SRV are at the highest risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD). Nevertheless, risk stratification for SCD is scarce in this cohort and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator indication is currently limited to secondary prevention. Vascular access and the incidence of device-related complications, such as infections, inappropriate shocks and device system failure, represent additional challenges to implantable cardiac electronic device therapy in patients with SRV. A multidisciplinary approach with tertiary expertise and future collaborative research are all paramount to further the care for this challenging nonetheless ever increasing cohort of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barracano et al. (2020) conducted a review in Systemic right ventricle in congenital heart disease. Implantable cardiac electronic device therapy was evaluated. Implantable cardiac electronic device therapy in systemic right ventricle patients faces challenges including uncertain CRT indications and limited sudden cardiac death risk stratification.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: