Key result
The 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on bradycardia shifted emphasis from device-based implantation recommendations to the evaluation and management of disease states.
Why the study?
The 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Bradycardia Guideline shifted emphasis from device implantation to evaluating and managing disease states, prompting a review to highlight these guideline changes and describe key clinical elements.
The 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline shifts the focus of bradycardia management from arbitrary heart rate cutoffs to symptom assessment and disease state management.
Supports symptom-focused bradycardia evaluation over rate cutoffs; leaves open effects on implantation rates and outcomes.
Bradycardia is a commonly observed arrhythmia and a frequent occasion for cardiac consultation. Defined as a heart rate of less than 50-60 bpm, bradycardia can be observed as a normal phenomenon in young athletic individuals, and in patients as part of normal aging or disease (Table 1). Pathology that produces bradycardia may occur within the sinus node, atrioventricular (AV) nodal tissue, and the specialized His-Purkinje conduction system. Given the overlap of heart rate ranges with non-pathologic changes, assessment of symptoms is a critical component in the evaluation and management of bradycardia. Treatment should rarely be prescribed solely on the basis of a heart rate lower than an arbitrary cutoff or a pause above certain duration. In the 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients with Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay (referred to hereafter as the 2018 Bradycardia Guideline), there was a significant shift in emphasis from prior guidelines that emphasized device-based implantation recommendations to a focus on evaluation and management of disease states [1,2]. In this review, we will highlight the changes in the new guideline as well as describe the key elements in evaluation and management of patients presenting with bradycardia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sidhu et al. (2019) conducted a review in Bradycardia. 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on Bradycardia was evaluated. The 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on bradycardia shifted emphasis from device-based implantation recommendations to the evaluation and management of disease states.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: