Key result
Better 4D CTA-CS collateral status linked to ~75% lower risk of poor 3-month stroke outcome.
Why the study?
The study aimed to assess the value of collateral circulation and BNP in predicting clinical outcomes and stroke subtypes before endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke.
Do collateral circulation status and serum BNP levels predict clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing endovascular treatment?
Cohort (n=182)
No
Do collateral circulation status and serum BNP levels predict clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing endovascular treatment?
Combining four-dimensional computed tomography angiography collateral scoring with admission serum BNP levels improves prognostic prediction of functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients treated with endovascular therapy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
4D CTA-CS may refine post-EVT prognosis in acute ischemic stroke; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to verify the value of collateral circulation and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) in predicting clinical outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and their biomarker value for stroke subtypes before endovascular treatment (EVT). Patients and Methods: In this retrospective study, 182 patients who underwent EVT for unilateral anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion between March 2016 and January 2022 were analyzed. The modified collateral circulation scoring system on four-dimensional computed tomography angiography (4D CTA-CS) was used to assess collateral status, and stroke subtypes were determined according to the TOAST classification criteria. Patients were divided into good (mRS ≤ 2) and poor outcome (mRS > 2) groups based on their modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 3 months. Results: 4D CTA-CS was an independent predictor of the clinical outcome for all AIS patients (odds ratio = 0.253; 95% CI, 0.147–0.437; p < 0.001), CE stroke patients (odds ratio = 0.513; 95% CI, 0.280–0.939; p = 0.030), and LAA stroke patients (odds ratio = 0.148; 95% CI, 0.049–0.447; p = 0.001). The BNP was a biomarker for clinical outcome prediction in CE (odds ratio = 1.004; 95% CI, 1.001–1.008; p = 0.005) but not in LAA patients. Combined with BNP, 4D CTA-CS improved predictive values for clinical outcomes (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Collateral status and BNP could be used as independent predictors of clinical outcomes in AIS patients and could determine stroke subtypes (CE stroke or LAA stroke). In addition, the model of 4D CTA-CS combined with BNP was the most effective in predicting clinical outcomes compared with collateral status or BNP alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cao et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Acute ischemic stroke with unilateral anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion (n=182). Collateral circulation status (4D CTA-CS) and serum BNP levels vs. Poor collateral circulation and lower serum BNP levels was evaluated on Clinical outcome based on modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 3 months (good outcome: mRS ≤ 2) (OR 0.253, 95% CI 0.147-0.437, p=<0.001). Collateral status assessed by 4D CTA-CS was an independent predictor of clinical outcome at 3 months (OR 0.253) in acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing endovascular treatment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: