Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) benefits type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients on multiple daily insulin injections (MDI), but its role in non-intensive insulin therapy remains underexplored. This study evaluates whether a short-term CGM non-blinded can postpone the escalation to multiple daily insulin injections in people with poorly controlled T2D.Methods This retrospective real-world study analyzed data from 309 adults with T2D in primary care who used a 10 or 14-day CGM (2020–2024). The primary objective was to assess CGM’s impact on therapy escalation, particularly to MDI. The secondary objective was to identify factors predicting the intensification of glucose-lowering therapy (GLT).Results Among the 309 participants (median age: 65 [56–73] years, diabetes duration: 16 [11–23] years, baseline HbA1c: 8.6% [70 mmol/mol]), 91.3% were deemed unsuitable for MDI based on CGM results (non-MDI GLT group, n = 282). In this group, 76% achieved an HbA1c-GMI differential > 0.5%, and 54% >1.0% after 14 day-CGM. Basal insulin use decreased slightly (70% to 64%, p = 0.13), while twice-daily insulin increased (12% to 18%, p = 0.02). GLTs remained largely unchanged.Conclusion A short-term CGM prevented MDI escalation in 91.3% of poorly controlled T2D adults, reinforcing its role as a cost-effective strategy. CGM likely improved self-management behaviors, as evidenced by frequent HbA1c-GMI differentials, reflecting better management of hyperglycemia. These findings highlight CGM as a practical behavioral and therapeutic tool in diabetes care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oriot et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: