Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: Primary stability is a prerequisite for implant osseointegration. Some degree of misfit between an implant and its osteotomy is required to ensure primary stability, and this is typically achieved by undersizing an implant osteotomy. In this preclinical study, we aimed at understanding the relationship between misfit, insertion torque, implant stability, and their cumulative short- and longer-term effects on peri-implant bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We placed implants in maxillary extraction sites of a rat; in the control group, these implants had minimal misfit while those in the test group had a high degree of misfit and therefore osseo-densified the peri-implant bone. RESULTS: Compared to controls, the misfit-induced stresses produced by osseo-densification led to micro-fractures in the peri-implant bone and an extensive zone of dying osteocytes. High interfacial pressures produced a pro-resorptive environment as shown by tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase activity and cathepsin K immunostaining (IHC). The lack of alkaline phosphatase activity and collagen I IHC supported the absence of new bone formation. Collectively, micro-computed tomography imaging, quantification of bone-implant contact (BIC), vimentin, and IL1-β IHCs demonstrated that implant failure occurred soon afterward, which presented as a crater-like lesion filled with fibrous, inflamed granulation tissue around the test implants. CONCLUSION: By controlling every other risk indicator, we confirmed how excessive osseo-densification can lead directly to osseo-destruction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coyac et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: