Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Average monthly price data from twelve hinterland markets and the Houston port price for wheat are studied in a cointegration framework using the Engle‐Granger “two‐step” procedure and Johansen's maximum likelihood procedure. Out‐of‐sample forecasts from an error correction model are compared to those from a vector autoregression fit to levels and a univariate autoregression fit to first differences. This comparison suggests that modeling these (cointegrated) data as a levels vector autoregression, rather than as an error‐correction process, results in significantly higher error bias, but lower error variance, at long horizons.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bessler et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: