Key result
Uncomplicated, controlled hypertension was statistically equivalent to nonhypertensive controls for local heat-induced cutaneous vasodilation when pooled across multiple skin sites (P=0.003).
Why the study?
To examine the pooled effects of hypertension on nitric oxide-dependent vasodilation during local heating across multiple nonglabrous skin regions and explore regional differences.
Does uncomplicated, controlled hypertension alter local heat-induced vasodilation in nonglabrous skin compared to nonhypertensive controls?
Observational (n=28)
Does uncomplicated, controlled hypertension alter local heat-induced vasodilation in nonglabrous skin compared to nonhypertensive controls?
Uncomplicated, controlled hypertension does not significantly impair local heat-induced cutaneous vasodilation when pooled across multiple skin sites.
Controlled hypertension shows preserved cutaneous vasodilation; leaves open effects in untreated or severe cases.
The objective of this study was 1) to examine pooled effects of hypertension on nitric oxide (NO)-dependent vasodilation during local heating across multiple nonglabrous skin regions, and 2) explore regional differences. Responses were compared between 14 participants with uncomplicated hypertension controlled with medication (7 females, 61 ± 6 yr) and 14 age-matched nonhypertensive controls (6 females; 60 ± 5 yr). Cutaneous vascular conductance, normalized to maximum vasodilation (%CVC max ), was assessed at the upper chest, abdomen, dorsal forearm, thigh, and lateral calf during local heating. Across all regions, local skin temperatures were simultaneously increased from 33°C to 42°C (1°C·10 s −1 ) and held until a stable heating plateau was achieved (∼40 min), followed by continuous infusion of 20 mM of N G -nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME; ∼40 min) at all sites until a stable l-NAME plateau was achieved. The difference between heating and l-NAME plateaus was defined as the NO-contribution. Statistical equivalence for each heating phase was determined based on equivalence bounds of ±10%CVC max for between-group differences. Pooled (all-regions) %CVC max responses were equivalent for baseline (two one-sided t tests; P < 0.001), heating plateau ( P = 0.002), l-NAME plateau ( P = 0.028), and NO-contribution ( P = 0.003). For individual regions, responses were equivalent at baseline for the abdomen, thigh, and calf, the heating plateau for the thigh, and the l-NAME plateau for the calf (all P < 0.05). Conversely, the calf heating plateau was lower in the hypertension group ( t test; P < 0.05). Local heat-induced cutaneous vasodilation was statistically equivalent between individuals with uncomplicated, controlled hypertension, and nonhypertensive age-matched adults when pooled across multiple skin sites. Conversely, individual between-region comparisons were generally too variable to permit definitive conclusions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McGarr et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Uncomplicated, controlled hypertension (n=28). Uncomplicated, controlled hypertension vs. Nonhypertensive age-matched controls was evaluated on Pooled (all-regions) %CVC max responses for NO-contribution (p=0.003). Uncomplicated, controlled hypertension was statistically equivalent to nonhypertensive controls for local heat-induced cutaneous vasodilation when pooled across multiple skin sites (P=0.003).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: