Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The diamides and disulfonamides m-C(6)H(4)(CONHAr)(2) (Ar = Ph, 1; p-n-BuC(6)H(4), 2, 2,4,6-Me(3)C(6)H(2), 3), m-C(6)H(4)(SO(2)NHPh)(2), 4, and 2,6-C(6)H(3)N(CONHPh)(2), 5, readily synthesized on a multigram scale, bind strongly to halides and acetate in organic solvents with K(a)'s as high as 6.1 x 10(4) (NMR spectroscopy). The binding stoichiometry is 1:1 in solution for all cases except for the 4.F(-) and 4.OAc(-) complexes, where both 1:1 and 1:2 binding stoichiometries were found. The association constants in CD(2)Cl(2) ((1)H NMR) follow the trend Cl(-) > Br(-) > I(-) for all the receptors. F(-) and OAc(-) binding may be stronger or weaker than Cl(-) depending on the nature of the receptor. The presence of the pyridine nitrogen in 5 and of the more rigid amide in 1-3 and 5 vs the less rigid sulfonamide structure in 4 increases selectivity for smaller anions. The enthalpy and entropy of formation for 2.Cl(-) were DeltaH = -31 kJ/mol; DeltaS = -23 J/(mol.K) (VT-NMR). The X-ray structure of [PPh(4)](2)[1.Br][Br].CH(2)Cl(2), shows 1:1 complexation of Br(-) via two N-H.Br(-) hydrogen bonds and a syn-syn nonplanar binding conformation for 1. Solution hydrogen bonding was confirmed by FT-IR and NMR spectroscopy. The receptor conformation changes on complexation. Trends in structure/binding relationships show receptor flexibility is an important factor in anion recognition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kavallieratos et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: