Key result
Vagus nerve stimulation is an effective palliative treatment that improves quality of life and reduces care needs, despite insufficient diagnosis-related group financing coverage.
Why the study?
The clinical, organizational, financial, and economic impact of vagus nerve stimulation in drug-resistant epilepsies, as well as congruity between costs incurred and reimbursement, needed assessment.
Does Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) improve clinical outcomes and quality of life, and what is its economic impact in patients with medical intractable epileptic syndromes not eligible for resective surgery?
Does Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) improve clinical outcomes and quality of life, and what is its economic impact in patients with medical intractable epileptic syndromes not eligible for resective surgery?
VNS is an effective palliative treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy that improves quality of life, but current DRG reimbursement is insufficient to cover device costs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
VNS may reduce seizure burden and care needs in drug-resistant epilepsy; leaves open questions on cost coverage and reimbursement adequacy.
Background: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a palliative treatment for medical intractable epileptic syndromes not eligible for resective surgery. Health technology assessment (HTA) represents a modern approach to the analysis of technologies used for healthcare. The purpose of this study is to assess the clinical, organizational, financial, and economic impact of VNS therapy in drug-resistant epilepsies and to establish the congruity between costs incurred and health service reimbursement. Methods: The present study used an HTA approach. It is based on an extensive detailed bibliographic search on databases (Medline, Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane, sites of scientific societies and institutional sites). The HTA study includes the following issues: (a) social impact and costs of the disease; (b) VNS eligibility and clinical results; (c) quality of life (QoL) after VNS therapy; (d) economic impact and productivity regained after VNS; and (e) costs of VNS. Results: Literature data indicate VNS as an effective treatment with a potential positive impact on social aspects and on quality of life. The diagnosis-related group (DRG) financing, both on national and regional levels, does not cover the cost of the medical device. There was an evident insufficient coverage of the DRG compared to the full cost of implanting the device. Conclusions: VNS is a palliative treatment for reducing seizure frequency and intensity. Despite its economic cost, VNS should improve patients’ quality of life and reduce care needs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marras et al. (2020) conducted a review in Drug-resistant epilepsy. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) was evaluated on Clinical, organizational, financial, and economic impact. Vagus nerve stimulation is an effective palliative treatment that improves quality of life and reduces care needs, despite insufficient diagnosis-related group financing coverage.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: