Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Survey analysis reveals how interlocking power dyads influence operational performance in firms, indicating important dependencies.
To lay the foundation for the study of supply chain power, we study power configurations at the level of interlocking power dyads ( IPD s), viewing the simultaneous effect of upstream and downstream power. We build on four key constructs: dependence asymmetry (resource dependence theory), joint dependence (embeddedness perspective), power type differential (based on French & Raven, 1959), and power source asymmetry. We examine the research question of what the relationship is between IPD s and the focal firm's operational performance, developing hypotheses based on the dependence asymmetry, joint dependence, power type differential, and power source asymmetry of theoretical IPD s. A survey of over 600 respondents in China was used to collect data on focal firm perceptions of upstream and downstream power, with cluster analysis yielding eight IPD s. Inferential analysis revealed the importance of joint dependence, dependence asymmetry, power type differential, and power source asymmetry to the operational performance of the focal firm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huo et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: