Key result
The fraction of metabolic energy required for activation was significantly larger for eccentric (0.56 ± 0.17) than for concentric contractions (0.37 ± 0.07) in mouse soleus muscle fiber bundles.
Why the study?
Available data on muscle energetics rely on bouts of fewer than 10 contractions, whereas metabolic energy consumption is mostly relevant during steady-state locomotion.
Absolute Event Rate: 0.37% vs 0.56%
p-value: p=0.031
In mouse soleus muscle bundles, the fraction of metabolic energy required for activation is significantly different between concentric and eccentric contractions during prolonged activity.
Research Meaning:* Extends metabolic assessment to steady-state conditions (locomotion-like), leaving.
Currently available data on the energetics of isolated muscle preparations are based on bouts of less than 10 muscle contractions, whereas metabolic energy consumption is mostly relevant during steady state tasks such as locomotion. In this study we quantified the energetics of small fibre bundles of mouse soleus muscle during prolonged (2 minutes) contractions. Bundles (N=9) were subjected to sinusoidal length changes, while measuring force and oxygen consumption. Stimulation (5 pulses at 100 Hz) occurred either during shortening or during lengthening. Movement frequency (2-3 Hz) and amplitude (0.25-0.50 mm; corresponding to ±4-8 % muscle fibre strain) were close to that reported for mouse soleus muscle during locomotion. The experiments were performed at 32 °C. The contributions of cross-bridge cycling and muscle activation to total metabolic energy expenditure were separated by application of blebbistatin. The mechanical work per contraction cycle decreased sharply during the first 10 cycles, emphasising the importance of prolonged series of contractions. The mean ±SD fraction of metabolic energy required for activation was 0.37 ±0.07 and 0.56 ±0.17 for concentric and eccentric contractions, respectively (both 0.25 mm, 2 Hz). The mechanical efficiency during concentric contractions increased with contraction velocity from 0.12 ±0.03 (0.25 mm 2 Hz) to 0.15 ±0.03 (0.25 mm, 3 Hz) and 0.16 ±0.02 (0.50 mm, 2 Hz) and was -0.22 ±08 during eccentric contractions (0.25 mm, 2 Hz). The percentage of type I fibres correlated positively with mechanical efficiency during concentric contractions, but did not correlate with the fraction of metabolic energy required for activation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lemaire et al. (2019) studied Healthy (animal model) (n=9). Repetitive concentric and eccentric contractions with blebbistatin vs. Concentric vs eccentric contractions was evaluated on Fraction of metabolic energy required for activation (p=0.031). The fraction of metabolic energy required for activation was significantly larger for eccentric (0.56 ± 0.17) than for concentric contractions (0.37 ± 0.07) in mouse soleus muscle fiber bundles.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: