Key result
Insulin resistance was associated with increased odds of an abnormal spatial QRS-T angle in women (OR 1.08; 95% CI 1.03-1.16) but not significantly in men (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.96-1.11).
Why the study?
Insulin resistance can impair cardiac electrical conductivity, but its relationship with spatial QRS-T angle had not been examined in the general population.
Is insulin resistance associated with an abnormal spatial QRS-T angle in American adults?
Cross-Sectional
Yes
Is insulin resistance associated with an abnormal spatial QRS-T angle in American adults?
Odds Ratio: 1.08 (95% CI 1.03–1.16)
Insulin resistance is associated with an increased odds of an abnormal spatial QRS-T angle, particularly in women.
BACKGROUND: Insulin resistance can impair the electrical conductivity of the heart. Spatial QRS-T axis reflects ventricular depolarization and repolarization. The relationship between insulin resistance and spatial QRS-T angle has not been examined in the general population. OBJECTIVE: We examined the relationship between insulin resistance and spatial QRS-T angle in an American population-based sample. METHODS: We used data collected from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III (NHANES III), and a directed acyclic graph to select confounders. We fitted logistic regression models and adjusted for the effect of the confounders. We stratified all analyses by gender. RESULTS: The odds ratios (OR) of the abnormal QRS-T angle and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for females and males were 1.08 (1.03-1.16) and 1.03 (0.96-1.11), respectively. A 5-unit increase in insulin resistance in females increased the odds of an abnormal QRS-T angle by 47% (OR = 1.47, 95% CI, 1.10-2.10); in males, a 5-unit increase in insulin resistance increased the OR by 17% (OR = 1.17, 95% CI, 0.82-1.70). CONCLUSIONS: Spatial QRS-T angle may be associated with insulin resistance, especially in women. The individuals with a higher insulin resistance value had higher odds for major adverse cardiovascular events. Nevertheless, the results of this study should be verified in prospective studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Faramawi et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in General population. Insulin resistance vs. Lower insulin resistance was evaluated on Abnormal spatial QRS-T angle (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.03-1.16). Insulin resistance was associated with increased odds of an abnormal spatial QRS-T angle in women (OR 1.08; 95% CI 1.03-1.16) but not significantly in men (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.96-1.11).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: