Key result
QRS vector deviations occur in ~90% of abnormal QRS-T angles, outpacing T vector deviations.
Why the study?
Abnormal QRS-T angles are prognostic markers for cardiovascular deaths, but the mechanistic background regarding electrical activation and/or recovery disturbances is not known.
Cross-Sectional (n=5,796)
No
Absolute Event Rate: 90% vs 65%
Abnormal QRS-T angles in a general population cohort are more frequently driven by electrical activation disturbances (QRS deviations) than recovery disturbances (T wave deviations).
QRS deviations predominate in abnormal QRS-T angles; hypothesis-generating for vector ECG metrics, needs prospective validation.
INTRODUCTION: Abnormal QRS-T angles are prognostic markers for cardiovascular deaths including sudden cardiac death. They occur in ∼5-6% of population-based cohorts but in ∼20% of patients with diabetes. The mechanistic background, electrical activation and/or recovery disturbances, is not known and the topic of this study. METHODS: Applying Frank vectorcardiography (VCG) and simultaneously recorded scalar 12‑lead ECG, electrical activation and recovery of abnormal QRS-T angles were studied in 311 participants (5.4%) from a population-based cohort of 5796 women and men in the main Swedish CArdio-Pulmonary bio-Imaging Study (SCAPIS) in Gothenburg. Cut-off values for the peak and mean QRS-T angles were > 124° and > 119°, based on the >95th percentile among all 1080 participants in the pilot SCAPIS and reference values for normal directions (Q1-Q3) from 319 apparently healthy (30%) of them. RESULTS: Of 311 cases 17% had known cardiac disease. Deviations of QRS and QRSarea-vectors from reference limits (90%) were significantly more common than deviations of T- and Tarea-vectors (65%). Standard ECG signs suggested pathophysiology in 20%; left bundle branch block (LBBB) and voltage criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy being most frequent (9-10%) each. Sub-group analysis of the 30 with LBBB showed very large variability in vector directions. CONCLUSIONS: Our observations provide mechanistic insights about abnormal QRS-T angles of potential value for future prognostic and interventional studies. The results also have potential implications for LBB area pacing and the approach to left ventricular hypertrophy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bergfeldt et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in Abnormal QRS-T angles (n=5,796). Frank vectorcardiography (VCG) and scalar 12-lead ECG was evaluated on Deviations of QRS and QRSarea-vectors vs T- and Tarea-vectors from reference limits. In participants with abnormal QRS-T angles, deviations of QRS and QRSarea-vectors from reference limits (90%) were significantly more common than deviations of T- and Tarea-vectors (65%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: