Key result
Spatial QRS-T angle >110° linked to ~240% higher risk of death or secondary ICD in LVSD.
Why the study?
Does an increased spatial QRS-T angle (>110°) predict all-cause mortality or secondary ICD implantation in patients with LVEF 31-40%?
Cohort (n=295)
No
Does an increased spatial QRS-T angle (>110°) predict all-cause mortality or secondary ICD implantation in patients with LVEF 31-40%?
An ECG-derived spatial QRS-T angle >110° strongly predicts arrhythmic events, all-cause death, and heart failure admissions in patients with LVEF 31-40%, potentially identifying candidates for primary prevention ICDs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May refine risk stratification in LV systolic dysfunction; leaves open utility for guiding primary prevention ICDs.
BACKGROUND: Increased spatial QRS-T angle has been shown to predict appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrilIator (ICD) therapy in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). We performed a retrospective cohort study in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 31-40% to assess the relationship between the spatial QRS-T angle and other advanced ECG (A-ECG) as well as echocardiographic metadata, with all-cause mortality or ICD implantation for secondary prevention. METHODS: 534 patients ≤75 years of age with LVEF 31-40% were identified through an echocardiography reporting database. Digital 12-lead ECGs were retrospectively matched to 295 of these patients, for whom echocardiographic and A-ECG metadata were then generated. Data mining was applied to discover novel ECG and echocardiographic markers of risk. Machine learning was used to develop a model to predict possible outcomes. RESULTS: 49 patients (17%) had events, defined as either mortality (n = 16) or ICD implantation for secondary prevention (n = 33). 72 parameters (58 A-ECG, 14 echocardiographic) were univariately different (p<0.05) in those with vs. without events. After adjustment for multiplicity, 24 A-ECG parameters and 3 echocardiographic parameters remained different (p<2x10-3). These included the posterior-to-leftward QRS loop ratio from the derived vectorcardiographic horizontal plane (previously associated with pulmonary artery pressure, p = 2x10-6); spatial mean QRS-T angle (134 vs. 112°, p = 1.6x10-4); various repolarisation vectors; and a previously described 5-parameter A-ECG score for LVSD (p = 4x10-6) that also correlated with echocardiographic global longitudinal strain (R2 = - 0.51, P < 0.0001). A spatial QRS-T angle >110° had an adjusted HR of 3.4 (95% CI 1.6 to 7.4) for secondary ICD implantation or all-cause death and adjusted HR of 4.1 (95% CI 1.2 to 13.9) for future heart failure admission. There was a loss of complexity between A-ECG and echocardiographic variables with an increasing degree of disease. CONCLUSION: Spatial QRS-T angle >110° was strongly associated with arrhythmic events and all-cause death. Deep analysis of global ECG and echocardiographic metadata revealed underlying relationships, which otherwise would not have been appreciated. Delivered at scale such techniques may prove useful in clinical decision making in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gleeson et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVEF 31-40%) (n=295). Spatial QRS-T angle >110° vs. Spatial QRS-T angle ≤110° was evaluated on All-cause mortality or secondary prevention ICD implantation (HR 3.4, 95% CI 1.6-7.4, p=0.001). A spatial QRS-T angle >110° was associated with a increased risk of secondary ICD implantation or all-cause death in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: