Key result
Prolonged QTc interval was associated with an increased risk of 1-year mortality among patients hospitalized with COVID-19 (HR 1.69; 95% CI 1.06-2.68; p=0.027).
Why the study?
The predictive value of a prolonged QTc for myocardial injury and long-term mortality among patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection was not well known.
Does prolonged QTc predict myocardial injury and 1-year mortality in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection?
Cohort (n=335)
Does prolonged QTc predict myocardial injury and 1-year mortality in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection?
Hazard Ratio: 1.69 (95% CI 1.06–2.68)
Absolute Event Rate: 40.4% vs 15.5%
p-value: p=0.027
Prolonged QTc at admission is an independent predictor of myocardial injury and 1-year mortality in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.
Prolonged QTc may flag higher-risk COVID-19 inpatients; leaves open whether monitoring or intervention alters myocardial injury or mortality.
Background QT interval prolongation is common in critically ill patients and is associated with increased mortality. However, the predictive value of a prolonged corrected QT interval (QTc) for myocardial injury and long-term mortality among patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection is not well known. Purpose To evaluate the association of prolonged QTc with myocardial injury and with 1-year mortality among patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection. Materials and Methods A total of 335 consecutive patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection were prospectively studied. All patients underwent a comprehensive echocardiographic evaluation within 48 h from admission. Using the Bazett formula, the QTc interval was calculated from the first ECG tracing recorded at the ER. QTc ≥ 440 ms in males and ≥450 ms in females was considered prolonged. Patients with elevated cardiac biomarkers and/or echocardiographic signs of myocardial dysfunction were considered to have myocardial injury. The predictive value of QTc prolongation for myocardial injury was calculated using a multivariate binary regression model. One-year mortality rate of patients with and without QTc prolongation was compared using the log-rank test, and a multivariate Cox regression model adjusting for multiple covariates was performed to evaluate the 1-year mortality risk. Results One-hundred and nine (32.5%) patients had a prolonged QTc. Compared to patients without QTc prolongation, patients with prolonged QTc were older (70 ± 14.4 vs. 62.7 ± 16.6, p < 0.001), had more comorbidities, and presented with a more severe disease. Prolonged QTc was an independent predictor for severe or critical disease (adjusted HR 2.14, 95% CI 1.3–3.5; p = 0.002) and myocardial injury (adjusted HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.22–3.5; p = 0.007). One-year mortality of patients with prolonged QTc was higher than those with no QTc prolongation (40.4% vs. 15.5; p < 0.001). Following adjustment to multiple covariates including myocardial injury and disease severity, QTc prolongation was found to be associated with increased 1-year mortality risk (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.06–2.68, p = 0.027). Conclusion Prolonged QTc is associated with disease severity, myocardial injury and 1-year mortality among patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Banai et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in COVID-19 infection (n=335). Prolonged QTc interval vs. No QTc prolongation was evaluated on 1-year mortality (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.06-2.68, p=0.027). Prolonged QTc interval was associated with an increased risk of 1-year mortality among patients hospitalized with COVID-19 (HR 1.69; 95% CI 1.06-2.68; p=0.027).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: