Identifies the optimal shale oil interval in Jiyang depression, suggesting more accurate content estimation techniques.
Shale oil content is commonly evaluated using Rock-Eval pyrolysis S1, but conventional S1 may underestimate total oil content because light hydrocarbons can be lost during storage and heavy hydrocarbons may remain undetected below 300 °C. This study evaluates the shale oil sweet spot interval of the lower Es3 sub-member (Es3L) in the Bonan subsag, Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, by integrating organic geochemical data, open-system hydrocarbon generation simulation, gold-tube pyrolysis, and corrected oil-content calculation. The results show that correction of both light and heavy hydrocarbon losses improves the quantitative estimation of total shale oil content. A three-segment relationship between corrected total oil content and TOC defines the enrichment threshold for the Es3L shale, with TOC > 2.4% indicating enriched shale oil resources. Movable oil content, calculated from the difference between total oil content and adsorbed oil content, further constrains sweet spot identification. The interval of 2981-3041 m in Well L69 satisfies both enrichment and movability criteria and is therefore identified as the preferred sweet spot interval. The proposed workflow provides a practical framework for shale oil sweet spot evaluation in the Bonan subsag and comparable lacustrine shale systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: