Post hoc analysis evaluates AREDS/2's impact on macular telangiectasia progression, indicating no significant effect.
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether oral Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS/2) supplementation is associated with structural or functional disease progression over 24 months in patients with Macular Telangiectasia Type 2 (MacTel). METHODS: This post hoc analysis included 208 participants enrolled in two 24-month Phase 3 clinical trials of revakinagene taroretcel-lwey for MacTel (sham, n = 98; treated, n = 110). Consistent AREDS/2 exposure was defined by documented intake at baseline and month 24. The primary outcome was 24-month change in ellipsoid zone (EZ) area loss. Secondary outcomes included changes in reading speed, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and aggregate retinal sensitivity. Non-randomized exposure was adjusted using a doubly robust framework combining inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and multivariable survey-weighted linear regression. RESULTS: In the sham cohort, AREDS/2 supplementation was not associated with statistically significant differences in 24-month EZ area loss (P = 0.258). In the treated cohort, an initial association with greater EZ area loss among AREDS/2 users (P = 0.032) became non-significant after full multivariable adjustment for age, sex, and diabetes status (P = 0.577). Secondary functional metrics showed no significant differences between groups across either cohort. CONCLUSIONS: AREDS/2 supplementation was not associated with meaningful differences in structural or functional MacTel progression over a 24-month period. These findings do not provide evidence that routine AREDS/2 supplementation slows EZ area loss or preserves visual function in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hatcher et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: