Aesthetic fellowship program evolves to enhance training features, emphasizing mentorship and clinical research.
Aesthetic fellowship in plastic surgery has evolved substantially since The Aesthetic Society joined the San Francisco Match in the 2017 to 2018 application cycle. Recent match data demonstrate a marked and sustained increase in applicant interest, with fellowship position fill rates rising accordingly. Drawing on data from national resident and program director surveys, recent match analyses, The Aesthetic Society endorsement criteria, and the senior author’s personal experience, this article examines what the ideal aesthetic fellowship should provide. We propose 5 defining features: breadth of exposure, graduated autonomy under close mentorship, elective time, protected time for clinical research and cadaver dissection, and education in the business and ecosystem of aesthetic practice. As competition within the aesthetic marketplace continues to grow, fellowship training will likely remain central to positioning plastic surgery graduates for long-term excellence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vishwanath et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: