Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Batch and column leaching tests examine COD, sulfate, and fluoride release in coal gangue, suggesting targeted monitoring and pollution control strategies.
Long-term open-air storage of coal gangue (CG) can generate leachates containing oxidizable components contributing to chemical oxygen demand (COD), together with sulfate (SO42−) and fluoride (F−), yet their source-term behavior remains poorly understood. In this study, batch and column leaching tests were conducted on multi-source CG samples and combined with ToF-SIMS (surface compositional mapping), solid-phase TOC gradient leaching, and PHREEQC-XGBoost-SHAP modeling (coupled geochemical–machine learning analysis). Batch-leachate COD levels ranged from 4.6 to 68.0 mg/L, while SO42− and F− concentrations reached maxima of approximately 317 and 1.29 mg/L, respectively. During column leaching, COD levels and SO42− concentrations were highest at low liquid-to-solid ratios (L/S) and subsequently decreased, with maximum initial values of 186.6 and 3074 mg/L, respectively, whereas F− exhibited delayed and persistent release at approximately 0.3–2.3 mg/L. Solid-phase TOC did not directly predict the COD response, and ToF-SIMS revealed aliphatic organic fragments associated with aluminosilicate surfaces that weakened or were redistributed after leaching. The COD–DOC discrepancy further indicated that dissolved organic matter alone could not fully explain the COD response, although the possible contribution of inorganic reducing species requires direct verification. Within the modeled framework, the sulfate source-term coefficient accounted for 69.4–76.9% of the modeled influence at L/S = 0.5–2.0 L/kg, while the influence of the HFO surface complexation increased during later leaching. In contrast, the F− source-term coefficient remained dominant over L/S = 0.5–10.0 L/kg, accounting for 97.0–97.9% of the modeled influence. These findings support parameter- and stage-specific monitoring and pollution control at CG disposal sites.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
S et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: