Randomized trial examines BMI's effect on AMH levels in Chinese women, indicating limited clinical relevance.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether BMI is associated with AMH in Chinese women, and whether PCOS, age, or testosterone modify this association. METHODS: We analyzed 670 women (20-39 years) from Hangzhou Women's Hospital. Primary analyses included linear regression and generalized additive models (GAM) with thin-plate splines, and multi-group structural equation modelling to test PCOS effect modification. Secondary analyses included interaction tests and Chinese BMI category comparisons. All models adjusted for age, FSH, LH, and testosterone. RESULTS: BMI showed no significant linear association with log-AMH (β = 0.008; adjusted R2 = 0.398). GAMs confirmed a near-linear relationship without threshold effects. However, underweight women (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2) had significantly lower log-AMH than normal-weight women (β = -0.14, P = 0.036), with no significant differences for overweight or obese categories. PCOS did not modify the BMI-AMH association. CONCLUSIONS: BMI is not a clinically meaningful predictor of ovarian reserve as a continuous variable. Lower AMH in underweight women highlights a subgroup warranting attention in reproductive assessments, while PCOS status does not influence this relationship.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: