What question did this study set out to answer?

The paper explores the concept of normative non-substitutability in AI alignment post-parity, focusing on its limitations.

July 23, 2026Open Access

The Type Will Not Hold Itself: Normative Non-Substitutability after Cognitive Parity

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

Reports failure in building normative non-substitutability, suggesting implications for AI system alignment.

The paper explores the concept of normative non-substitutability in AI alignment post-parity, focusing on its limitations.
Evaluates the coupling-internal locus defined by normative non-substitutability.
Critiques existing theories concerning coupling and participant-individuated relationships.
Analyzes failure modes and constructs theoretical gates regarding normative premises.
Normative non-substitutability fails to qualify as a robust solution for AI alignment beyond parity.
Establishing participant-individuated relationships does not ensure grip on conduct within the system.
The findings challenge existing theories by showing the gaps in accountability and the implications on system alignment.

Viktor Trncik (2026) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark