Cross-sectional mixed methods study describes information experiences and recommendations for care improvement in cancer patients.
Purpose To describe the information experiences of vaginal and vulvar cancer patients, including satisfaction, needs, and preferred sources at three key touchpoints: pre-diagnosis, diagnosis, and treatment. Methods This cross-sectional mixed methods study recruited women aged 18+ years living in Queensland, Australia, and diagnosed with primary vaginal or vulvar cancer between 01 June 2022 and 31 August 2023. We obtained self-reports of satisfaction with cancer information (Satisfaction with Cancer Information Profile, SCIP-B, range 7–35), need for information (study-specific measure designed in consultation with consumers including six items from the health system and information domain of the Supportive Care Needs Survey-Short Form, SCNS-SF34), and preferred sources of receiving information (Health Information National Trends Survey, HINTS). Participant-informed recommendations to improve information provision were derived from qualitative interviews. Results Of the 39 women who completed the quantitative questionnaire, 16 also participated in a qualitative interview. Mean scores for satisfaction with information increased from pre-diagnosis (20.8, SD 7.1) to during diagnosis (24.0, SD 8.4) and remained stable during treatment (24.8, SD 8.2). Approximately three-quarters of participants reported at least one moderate-to-high unmet information need at each touchpoint. Doctors, internet searches, and family/friends were the preferred information sources. Seventeen recommendations were developed relevant to pre-diagnosis ( n = 2), diagnosis ( n = 2), treatment ( n = 4), post-treatment ( n = 2), and across touchpoints ( n = 7). Conclusions Dissatisfaction with information and unmet information needs were prevalent among our participants diagnosed with vaginal or vulvar cancer. A variety of participant-informed recommendations were developed which can guide the improvement of information experiences across the cancer care continuum.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
DiSipio et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: