Examines control effectiveness in quadcopters with flexible arms, suggesting significant advancements in design.
The conventional dynamic model of most quadrotors in use today assumes a perfectly rigid frame, and the corresponding control systems are designed accordingly. However, as rotor spans increase and design constraints push toward ever-lighter structures, that assumption may no longer hold. In this study, we examine the simplest flexible-arm extension: a quadrotor whose four rotor arms are each connected to the base by passive viscoelastic joints, allowing each arm to rotate in a plane perpendicular to the base plane. We derive a complete nonlinear dynamic model via the Euler-Lagrange equations and develop a unique control architecture that explicitly compensates for the arms’ elastic response. Numerical simulations demonstrate superior disturbance rejection compared to a rigid-frame benchmark. Finally, experimental validation on a modified five-degree-of-freedom test platform confirms the accuracy of the model and the effectiveness of the control strategy, highlighting the practical feasibility of passive arm flexibility in quadrotor systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stoller et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: