Evaluates hydrodynamic treatment to enhance separation efficiency in spent drilling fluids, indicating potential for improved waste management.
Spent water-based drilling fluids generated during technological-well drilling for uranium production are high-solid, chemically heterogeneous suspensions whose treatment is constrained by water scarcity, waste-handling requirements, reagent demand and electrical-energy consumption. This study evaluated a recirculating flow-through disperser that converts pressure-driven flow into controlled nominal velocity gradients and localized contact zones. The laboratory-pilot dataset comprised five high-solid water-based spent-fluid samples, 120 hydrodynamic treatment runs, 216 particle-size-bin observations corresponding to 12 complete distributions, nine mechanical-mixing baseline tests and ten repeated-cycle runs. The investigated range covered nominal Camp–Stein-equivalent velocity gradients of 500–1500 s−1, treatment times of 60–180 s and flocculant dosages of 0–100 g/t dry solids. A 50 L batch was recirculated through a disperser with a cylindrical geometric envelope of approximately 4.75 L. The maximum separation efficiency was 94.20%. The recommended compromise condition (G = 1300 s−1, τ = 150 s and 50 g/t dry solids) achieved 92.15 ± 1.81% separation efficiency, residual aqueous-phase TSS of 125.2 ± 30.0 mg/L, water recovery of 83.84 ± 0.28%, sludge-volume reduction of 59.02 ± 2.11% and wall-plug specific energy consumption of 0.1227 ± 0.0062 kWh/m3. A separate ten-cycle series yielded 0.1245 ± 0.0065 kWh/m3, consistent with the triplicate compromise-mode result. Two-factor response-surface models reproduced the measured G–τ trends and provided prediction intervals for operating-window screening within the investigated fluid class. The findings support coupled energy–separation optimization, rather than selection of the maximum nominal mixing intensity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaliyev et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: