This theoretical work addresses biblical authority in postmodernism, suggesting a robust epistemology for the church.
PREFACE The contemporary theological landscape finds itself at a critical crossroads, heavily challenged by the fragmented epistemological paradigms of the postmodern era. As the foundational structures of absolute truth continue to be deconstructed by secular discourse, the discipline of Christian dogmatics is urgently called to justify its own cognitive claims. This book is born out of a profound academic and pastoral concern regarding how the contemporary church conceptualizes divine knowledge. By revisiting the essential tenets of prolegomena, this work aims to provide a robust, resilient framework that reassures the believer of the intellectual coherence and supreme authority of God’s self-disclosure. In navigating these complex philosophical waters, this treatise heavily draws upon the rich heritage of classical Protestant orthodoxy while critically interacting with contemporary epistemological challenges. The insights presented herein are deeply indebted to the foundational methodology of Herman Bavinck (2003) and the presuppositional consistency of Cornelius Van Til (2008). Rather than treating theology as a subjective byproduct of human sociological evolution, this volume approaches the sacred task as an objective science rooted entirely in the transcendent economy of divine revelation. It is designed to serve seminarians, pastors, and serious students of theology who refuse to let the shifting winds of culture dictate the parameters of eternal truth. ‘Ultimately, the goal of this study is not merely academic speculation, but the cultivation of a sanctified intellect that leads to deeper worship. To speak of biblical authority in a postmodern age requires more than a reactionary fundamentalism; it demands a sophisticated, thoroughly biblical epistemology that accounts for the noetic effects of sin and celebrates the illuminating work of the Holy Spirit (Plantinga, 2000). It is my sincere hope that this prolegomena will not only sharpen the reader’s apologetic defense but also foster a profound, reverent humility before the self-attesting voice of the living God who still speaks through His written Word.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tagor Parsaoran (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: