Randomized trial explores a new approach to biodesign in Indigenous contexts, suggesting innovative methodologies for sustainable futures.
From unceded Australian Country and neighbouring regions, this paper investigates biodesign as a situated, multi-scalar practice, attentive to place, material ecologies, and more‑than‑human relations, reporting from a different ‘patch’ to the dominant centre. Drawing on deep‑time Indigenous knowledge systems and emerging biotechnological practices, it contributes a relational, place‑responsive orientation for biodesign, extending its conceptual, ethical, and methodological possibilities. Through auto-ethnographic reflection and case studies spanning Indigenous-led practices, biomaterials research, and regenerative infrastructures, it reveals how biodesign is enacted differently when grounded in specific bioregional, cultural, and material conditions. The practices discussed in the paper demonstrate a bioinclusive aesthetic – embracing growth, decay, contamination, and microbial co‑habitation as regenerative design forces for shaping multispecies futures. Reframing biodesign in this way, as a pluriversal and multi-scalar activity, this study puts forward a set of principles for multi-scalar biodesign that foreground locality, relationality and responsibility when designing with living systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scardifield et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: