Qualitative analysis highlights the need for Nigeria's military to balance security and legal standards for effective internal management.
This study examines the relationship between Nigeria’s military actions and the laws that guide security and war globally. Since 1999, when Nigeria re-established democracy, the military’s role in handling internal security issues has grown, calling for an analysis of how those operations match up with constitutional rules. The study highlights the challenge of balancing security needs with legal and moral responsibilities in Nigeria’s unstable environment, marked by insurgencies, banditry and communal conflict. The main argument asserts that Nigeria’s military needs a new approach to internal security that combines effective tactics with legal and ethical standards to boost legitimacy and effectiveness. Employing a qualitative approach, the study uses secondary data collection of historical records, policies, case studies, peer-reviewed academic journals, government publications, reports from international organisations, and credible media sources and military documentary reports in Nigeria. The findings reveal that while the military has been vital in maintaining national unity amid security challenges, there are often conflicts between security needs and legal and ethical rules. The results suggest that effective internal security management goes beyond just military intervention; it demands a holistic approach that considers community dynamics, enhances governmental legitimacy and adheres to established legal and ethical frameworks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duruji et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: